matt

matt

CoreLogic: August Home Prices Increased 5.5 Percent Year Over Year

CoreLogic has released the CoreLogic Home Price Index and HPI Forecast for August 2018, which shows home prices rose both year over year and month over month. Home prices increased nationally by 5.5 percent year over year from August 2017. On a month-over-month basis, prices increased by 0.1 percent in August 2018.

Looking ahead, the CoreLogic HPI Forecast indicates that the national home-price index is projected to continue to increase by 4.7 percent on a year-over-year basis from August 2018 to August 2019. On a month-over-month basis, home prices are expected to decrease by 0.4 percent from August to September 2018. The CoreLogic HPI Forecast is a projection of home prices calculated using the CoreLogic HPI and other economic variables. Values are derived from state-level forecasts by weighting indices, according to the number of owner-occupied households for each state.

“The rise in mortgage rates this summer to their highest level in seven years has made it more difficult for potential buyers to afford a home,” said Dr. Frank Nothaft, chief economist for CoreLogic. “The slackening in demand is reflected in the slowing of national appreciation, as illustrated in the CoreLogic Home Price Index. National appreciation in August was the slowest in nearly two years, and we expect appreciation to slow further in the coming year.”

According to the CoreLogic Market Condition Indicators, an analysis of housing values in the country’s 100 largest metropolitan areas based on housing stock, 38 percent of metropolitan areas have an overvalued housing market as of August 2018. The MCI analysis categorizes home prices in individual markets as undervalued, at value or overvalued, by comparing home prices to their long-run, sustainable levels, which are supported by local market fundamentals (such as disposable income).

Also, as of August 2018, 18 percent of the top 100 metropolitan areas were undervalued, and 44 percent were at value. When looking at only the top 50 markets based on housing stock, 46 percent were overvalued, 12 percent were undervalued and 42 percent were at value. The MCI analysis defines an overvalued housing market as one in which home prices are at least 10 percent higher than the long-term, sustainable level. An undervalued housing market is one in which home prices are at least 10 percent below the sustainable level.

In 2018, CoreLogic together with RTi Research of Norwalk, Conn., conducted an extensive consumer housing sentiment study, combining consumer and property insights. The study assessed attitudes toward homeownership and the drivers of the home buying or renting decision process. August data indicates that, while home prices are cooling, they are still rising in most markets. Home sales are down in some metros, in part because sellers believe prices will continue to rise and that by waiting, they can sell their homes for a better price.

Many intend to use proceeds from the sale of their current home to fund the downpayment of their next home. Fully 66 percent of homeowners who are considering buying in the next 10 years will need to sell their current homes to finance their next one. Meanwhile, 35 percent of recent homebuyers said they used funds from the sale of their previous home to finance the down-payment of their current home.

“In some markets, homebuyers and sellers are remaining cautious and taking a pause as price appreciation continues to rise,” said Frank Martell, president and CEO of CoreLogic. “By waiting to sell, homeowners believe they will get the greatest return on their investment; the more money they have for a down-payment, the easier the purchase payments will be for their next home.”

 

Read more...

Perp Walk Friday: New Jersey Man Pleads Guilty of Mortgage, Real Estate Fraud

A New Jersey man pled guilty to charges that he conspired to defraud financially distressed homeowners, investors, and financial institutions of fees and income from mortgage and real estate transactions.

Hasan Hussain, 57, of Princeton, N.J., pled guilty to charges that he conspired to defraud them of rental income, mortgage payment funds, property ownership and proceeds from the sale of their properties. Also, he pled guilty to aggravated identity theft in connection with the fraud. Hussain had already been convicted in federal court in Massachusetts and incarcerated for masterminding a real estate fraud.

At sentencing on Jan. 8, 2018, Hussain faces up to 32 years in federal prison, five years of supervised release, and a fine of $1,250,000. A co-defendant in this matter, Ricardo Abreu, who pled guilty earlier this year, is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 30, 2018.

Hussain’s guilty plea was made before U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr., and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sandra R. Hebert, Richard B. Myrus, and William J. Ferland. Citing Department of Justice policy governing ongoing cases, Jim Martin, media relations for the department, declined The Mortgage Leader’s request for an interview.

Hussain admitted he used several business entities to trick distressed property owners, who were seeking loan modifications, into paying him fees, moving out of their homes, and then he sold their homes in short-sale transactions.  As part of the plea, Hussain further admitted that he convinced lenders to agree to artificially low sale prices for the distressed property owners’ homes by having other individuals damage the properties prior to the short sales.

As a result, Hussain or individuals or businesses associated with him, acquired the properties at reduced prices, flipping them to investors at much higher prices. During his change of plea, Hussain admitted that these investors were defrauded of their funds, or good credit, or both when they agreed to purchase properties from Hussain.

Hussain further admitted that he assisted investors to acquire federally backed mortgages through fraudulent applications, which resulted in losses to the lenders or the Federal Housing Administration.  Some of the tactics employed by Hussain as part of the scheme included misuse of identities and cutting and pasting signatures on property deeds and financial documents.

As part of his plea agreement, Hussain admitted that his scheme resulted in losses between $550,000 and $1.5 million dollars; that 10 or more victims were harmed; and that at least some of his victims were particularly vulnerable, as a result of their personal situation.

Read more...

Hensarling: GSE 'Reform, While Critical, Has Proven Elusive'

 

Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) delivered the following statement at the full committee’s hearing on the 10th anniversary of the federal government’s takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSE).

Sept. 6th, 2008 is a day that will live on in economic infamy. For today marks a not-so-happy anniversary of one of the most frustrating and costly moments in recent financial history: namely, the 10-year anniversary of the federal takeover of the failed housing government sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The GSEs’ anti-competitive government charters and ever-increasing “affordable housing” mandates created a toxic mess of systemic risk. Their collapse directly led to the second worst financial crisis in our history, causing more than $190 billion of taxpayer bailouts and forcing them into a government-run conservatorship.

Embarrassingly, 10 years later, the GSEs remain in conservatorship, very much alive and very much unreformed as they quietly return to their pre-crisis market dominance. That’s bad news for competition, innovation, and, most of all, taxpayers, since the Congressional Budget Office has said their $5.1 trillion of mortgage obligations are “effectively guaranteed by the federal government.”

Meanwhile, as several of our witnesses will testify, systemic risk is building yet again. The cost and risk of continuing to do nothing is rising and rising at an alarming rate. Reform, while critical, has proven elusive. For almost 20 years, I along with a handful of reformers like Congressman Ed Royce have labored in vain to replace the GSEs' government-sanctioned monopoly with a new system based on competitive private capital, innovation, consumer choice, and market discipline.

We passed the PATH Act in the 113th Congress to do just that. I am reintroducing the PATH Act this week, and for no other reason it is the right thing to do and it will let me sleep better at night. Regrettably, its chances for passage remain slim. So as an alternative, I’ve decided to partner with Mr. Delaney on the other side of the aisle to propose a bipartisan compromise housing reform plan that preserves the government guarantee in the secondary mortgage market.

In the time I have remaining in Congress, this is the plan I will pursue.

Our discussion draft, which we will unveil later today, will repeal the GSEs’ charters, permanently ending their monopoly, and transition to a system that allows qualified mortgages backed by an approved private credit enhancer with regulated, diversified capital resources to access the explicit, full government securitization guarantee provided by Ginnie Mae. I believe the plan will preserve much of what is demanded in the current system: liquidity, the TBA market, and the 30-year pre-payable fixed mortgage. And it will do so while dispersing risk and leveling the playing field for all entrants into mortgage finance. Additional details on our proposal will be released later today.

While by no means perfect, we offer this proposal as a grand bargain on how to move past an increasingly dangerous status quo: codify an explicit government MBS guarantee into law, coupled with an accountable and effective affordability program in exchange for placing the taxpayer in a catastrophic loss position only diffusing the credit risk beyond two GSEs, and creating market competition.

If the political will to enact such reform stalls in this Congress or the next, the Administration can and should effectuate change. The President will appoint a new Federal Housing Finance Agency Director in January. The Director has broad, unilateral power as conservator of Fannie and Freddie to dramatically reduce their size, scope, and function. If Congress fails to act by early next year, I call upon the new Director to institute these reforms administratively. The grand bargain I have described does not necessarily represent my preferred policy or optimal policy, but I believe it represents an achievable policy and a good faith effort at bipartisan compromise. A decade without GSE reform has once again put homeowners, taxpayers, and the economy at risk. The time to act is now. With apologies to the rolling stones, “you can’t always get what you want, but if you try some time, you just might find, you get what you need” to avert the next housing crisis.

 

 

 

Read more...

FOLLOW US